Decision continuity, not chat history
From chat to decision continuity
Capture decisions in 30 seconds, surface contradictions and drift automatically, and brief new teammates with evidence-anchored context.
API Versioning
Due Jan 15 • Stream: Platform
Security concerns on Feature X
Maria Chen: “We’re deciding for patients, not with them.”
Pricing v2 conflicts with Enterprise discount
Detected by pattern analyzer
Points of interest (demo)
Jump to the most useful screens
Use these waypoints during the demo—each is wired to the live UI or shows graceful fallbacks if the API is offline.
Dashboard
Shows Needs Attention (revisit dates, unresolved dissent) and recent decisions. Start here to prove proactive value.
Record a decision
30-second capture: reasoning, dissent, uncertainty, stream selection, revisit date.
Decision detail
Full trace of dissent and uncertainty, alternatives, outcomes—structured for handoffs.
Why now
Chat is reactive. Continuity is proactive.
Teams keep repeating debates because the “why” is lost in threads. ContinuuAI mirrors your patterns and flags drift before it bites.
Rationale disappears
Context lives in meetings and DMs; successions start from zero.
Dissent gets buried
Concerns are voiced but not surfaced when decisions matter most.
Patterns stay invisible
Conflicts, drift, and forgotten revisits hide until they’re expensive.
How ContinuuAI works
Verify, don’t write. Let Julian mirror the patterns.
Capture in 30s
Structured form pre-fills context. Dissent and uncertainty are first-class.
Organize by stream
Decisions live in streams (product, compliance, platform) with ACLs.
Surface conflicts
Revisit reminders, unresolved dissent, and drift/conflict insights auto-appear.
Brief successors
Generate evidence-anchored briefings for new teammates instantly.
Product highlights
Purpose-built for decision continuity
Needs Attention
Live feed of revisit reminders, unresolved dissent, and insights.
Decision detail
Reasoning, constraints, dissent, uncertainty, and outcomes—preserved in one place.
Loading decision…
Stream • Decided by • Date
Ask Julian
Evidence-anchored answers citing the spans that back each response.
Based on your recorded decisions, backwards compatibility was critical in March, but the October decision did not mention it. Revisit assumption?
Guardrails
Non-directive, evidence-first, exit-safe
Evidence anchored
Every insight cites source spans—no free-floating opinions.
Non-directive
Julian mirrors patterns; it never tells you what to do.
Org-specific
Learns your glossary, entities, and patterns without fine-tuning the base model.
Exit-safe
Export everything—decisions, dissent, outcomes, insights—any time.
Ready to see your decision memory?
Jump into the dashboard or record the next decision in under a minute.
FAQ
What teams ask before they switch
Where does it run?
Locally/on your infra. Gemma via llama.cpp, no external LLM calls.
How are conflicts found?
Batch pattern analyzer compares assumptions/decisions, then verifies with the LLM.
How is dissent stored?
Dissent and uncertainty are structured records, linked to decisions and surfaced on dashboard.
Can we export?
Yes—event log, decisions, dissent, outcomes, and insights are all exportable.